This is the first time I’ve ever seen a government agencyask for advice on a public consumer forum like this one, so I am skeptical. ButI’ll bite.
First, let me clear up what you are asking. From your message, I’m assuming you are not intending on dismounting one of the engines, but just operating on one engine at a time. Is that correct? And the second engine would always be available if needed, is that correct? So, the inquiry from the brass really has to do with savings in fuel, maintenance, and extending the longevity of the engines. Is that correct?
The answer to your questions then depends on your operating environment. If your 8 meter RHIB is rigged like a typical CG rig, then a single 135 is too little power, unless you are just tooling around in small lakes, rivers, and ports in calm seas. With only one engine, and a typical setup, the weight will make it difficult to get up on plane, and when you do, it will not be stable. Besides that, all your potential savings would disappear because you’ll need higher RPM’s to maintain the plane, and the engine will be wearing faster. If you map the efficiency curve – RPM vs. MPH/KPH vs. GPH – for your particular crafts, in both duel engine and single engine configurations over a range of operating situations, you will likely see that the fuel savings would be minimal if you need any significant speed.
Also, I’m not an experienced RHIB boater, but it seems that the bigger ones almost demand a duel engine set-up for stability and maneuverability. With that shallow hull and typical weight, you’ll need both engines for maneuver, especially in high crosswinds and heavy currents. Also, if the operators are not highly experienced boaters, docking a single engine boat in tight quarters with a high crosswind can be a real challenge.