"I do a fair bit of "riggi
"I do a fair bit of "rigging" and have tried out most products that are on the market that promise to improve this, that and everything else - because inevitably someone will ask and I like to say "ya, I tried that and this is what I observed".
I ran a doelfin on both my 9.9's and 15 horse pushing a 14 1/2' Princecraft over the course of two summers - both off and on in different situations to see what they did for performance.
It worked well keeping the bow down in canals (where I run alot) that have a 7 mph speed limit - not really on plane at that speed, but kinda "jacked up" the transom (unfortuanately no way to measure how much extra stress that put on the motor, brackets or transom itself).
Outside of that narrow use, I found that contrary to what the claims on the packaging said - there was no increase in speed, no fuel savings at all and fiddled with a stop watch to try and gauge time to plane, but seriously, this is a "little boat" with a "low horsepower" motor, what's really the difference between 6.2 and 7.1 seconds. (speed comparible with/without via gps - fuel was simply tested over the same distance with and without - ya not totally scientific, but as close as you get with a very small motor)...
I did find that it made the motor alot more difficult to turn - likes to go straight all the time. And it does put tremendous stress on the cavitation plate.
That doesn't seem to be an issue with Mercs/OMC, but there have been a number of Suzuki's with busted cav's that were running fins - so take note if you are a 4 stroke Johnson owner - they were built by Suzuki the entire time the Johnson 4 strokes were in production.
As suggested, I found by simply shifting some weight forward you can get all the benefits of a fin.
And think about it - if they were the next best thing don't you think the mfg's would simply build motors with more pronounced cavitation plates?"