When measuring with an IR gun, is the thermostat housing the most accurate place on the engine?
I ran my starboard engine again yesterday and it's displaying 178 at idle, port engine was 180. Both new gauges and temp senders which I tested off the boat. They were both within a couple of degrees.
When I bought the boat, one gauge was off 20 degrees so I just changed them both along with matching sending units from Teleflex. In the survey, the #'s for each engine were 160/161 at idle and 181/176 at full. Not sure where the surveyor took those measurements though.
At the housing (on the "178" engine) I was getting 156 degrees at idle. So, no significant change after basically changing or cleaning the whole cooling system (u-coolers aside). Am I chasing a problem that doesn't really exist? After all the work I've done, I wanted to have gauges that didn't require a conversion factor to get the real temp.
I'm still connected to a "hose" and the strainer is staying full. I noticed that the belt tension spec in the Crusader manual is an 1/8" inch deflection which seems awefully tight to me. That's hardly any deflection at all. My belts aren't that tight, probabaly more like a 1/4" - maybe a hair more.
What do you guys think?
Bob
I ran my starboard engine again yesterday and it's displaying 178 at idle, port engine was 180. Both new gauges and temp senders which I tested off the boat. They were both within a couple of degrees.
When I bought the boat, one gauge was off 20 degrees so I just changed them both along with matching sending units from Teleflex. In the survey, the #'s for each engine were 160/161 at idle and 181/176 at full. Not sure where the surveyor took those measurements though.
At the housing (on the "178" engine) I was getting 156 degrees at idle. So, no significant change after basically changing or cleaning the whole cooling system (u-coolers aside). Am I chasing a problem that doesn't really exist? After all the work I've done, I wanted to have gauges that didn't require a conversion factor to get the real temp.
I'm still connected to a "hose" and the strainer is staying full. I noticed that the belt tension spec in the Crusader manual is an 1/8" inch deflection which seems awefully tight to me. That's hardly any deflection at all. My belts aren't that tight, probabaly more like a 1/4" - maybe a hair more.
What do you guys think?
Bob
Last edited:

