Logo

9.9 vs. 8 HP

denmarktwp

New member
I'm looking for a new motor for my 12' Lund. I'd like to compare the specs between the 8 and the 9.9 two strokes in the later years. Is there a place where I can find the specs for these motors?

Does anyone have personal experience using these two sizes?

Thanks
Wayne
 
Both good motors. Depends on what you mean by later years because originally the 6/8/9.9 shared the same block until the 90s then the 6/8 shared the block and the 9.9/15 shared blocks and the lower units are common to all of them. They both run so good that i would buy the most power i could afford. One thing the weakness on these motors is the lower unit make sure there is no water in them.
 
Thanks for the info. I had seen a post in the archives about the change of block size in 1986. So, that's what I meant by later years. I'm currently looking at a 1999 9.9, a 1993 9.9 and an 8 that I don't yet know the year.
 
The 6, 8 and 9.9 horse models were introduced in late 1985 as "New 1986 Models" (they replaced the 7.5 and 9.8 horse models in the line-up).

Between 1986 and midway through 1994 they shared the same block (roughly 12 cubic inches). The carb was different and the exhaust plate was different, all else was the same. So you got the extra horses because the motor could breath "in and out" easier in the higher horse model.

The 8 horse (or even the 6) could be "upped" to 9.9 with a few changes. It is more expensive to do now than it was back when since a couple of the original components needed were changed somewhat, and while they can be adapted to the older motors, it's more work, plus a couple other items that weren't originally required (ie. the original water tube will not fit on the new style exhaust plate, so "both" must be replaced).

In mid-1994 (identified by the "serial", production number) Merc started pairing the 9.9 with the 15 horse, which up until that time had been the only model based on the 16 cubic inch powerhead.

So from the mid-94 model change (which did change the design slightly of a few components), the 6 and 8 retained the 12 cube block and the 9.9 and 15 used the 16 cube block. Once again, a mid-94 up until the last 2 stroke 9.9 built (2012) could be turned into a 15 horse because it has the displacement needed. This "upgrade" is a simple carb swap - the other parts are all identical.

Personally I would look right past the 8 horse unless you get it for such a steal of a price that you can't pass it up.

Of what you have listed my first choice would be the 99, 9.9 because of the displacement advantage - but there is certainly nothing wrong with the 93 model.

I personally own an 86 and 87 model 9.9 as well as a 1991 15 horse - they are all great little motors.
 
Back
Top