Fish Stix
New member
Hi guys - as always - I value your collective knowledge and insight.
I have a Trojan F32 twin engine that's been running well on new Edelbrock carbs, and pertronix distributors. The problem is that on a 30 NM trip, the starboard side used 43 gallons, but the port side used 33 gallons. Quite a difference. And not exactly fuel efficient - at 0.7 and 0.9 MPG per side, and an overall of 0.4 MPG For both. Bottom was clean, sea surface flat, trim tabs deployed and trimmed, etc.. It's not that big a boat, and I was running 3600 for 15 to 17 kts. Those are some really bad numbers.
Thus the questions:
For the imbalance - I must have engaged the secondaries on the stbd motor for the 10 gallons for extra gas. Is there any other reason for such a disparity in gas usage (43 vs 33)
For overall guzzling - wow. I should look at the plugs for color (burning rich), and maybe pull the boat to get an actual weight, but what else should I look for? I know there's a ton of info out there, but what seems likely?
Thanks & Stay Safe!
Brooks
I have a Trojan F32 twin engine that's been running well on new Edelbrock carbs, and pertronix distributors. The problem is that on a 30 NM trip, the starboard side used 43 gallons, but the port side used 33 gallons. Quite a difference. And not exactly fuel efficient - at 0.7 and 0.9 MPG per side, and an overall of 0.4 MPG For both. Bottom was clean, sea surface flat, trim tabs deployed and trimmed, etc.. It's not that big a boat, and I was running 3600 for 15 to 17 kts. Those are some really bad numbers.
Thus the questions:
For the imbalance - I must have engaged the secondaries on the stbd motor for the 10 gallons for extra gas. Is there any other reason for such a disparity in gas usage (43 vs 33)
For overall guzzling - wow. I should look at the plugs for color (burning rich), and maybe pull the boat to get an actual weight, but what else should I look for? I know there's a ton of info out there, but what seems likely?
Thanks & Stay Safe!
Brooks