I'm coming in very late on this, but here is an unsolicited FYI, if I may:
The advantage of removing ALL spark plugs (in addition to post #10), is to reduce the load on the starter motor, so that max cranking rpm can be achieved.
The question now becomes, why would you NOT remove all of them for this test?
The dry/wet test can be valuable to determine if the piston rings were to be the primary cause of low cylinder pressures. The oil will temporarily bring cylinder pressure UP, by momentarily aiding in this seal, if the rings seal is not adequate to begin with.
Now.... here's the rub with the wet test, IMO.
The wet test works fairly well on vertical cylinder in-line engines. These pistons are relatively level, and if not dished, will allow the oil to form around the cylinder walls, where it will help with poor piston ring sealing..... and does so momentarily until the oil makes it past the ring set.
If pressue increases during this, then our rings are likely one cause of low cylinder pressure.
A "V" engine piston is not level! Add to this dished pistons (if applicable), and the oil will very likely pool at the low side of the cylinder, and perhaps primarily in the dished area.
If so, the test becomes ineffective as for the results hoped for!
If each cylinder were to have the same volume of oil added, and forced in via compressed air....., our chances of an effective "wet" test increase.
However, there is no perfect science to this, that I am aware of!
I think that it's a common misnomer that the wet test is effective! If this is not taken into account, it's only as good as the amount of oil that can actually reach the ring landings, and in a fairly even means.
What we may see, is a slight increase, due to the volume of oil now taking up space within the cylinder. This is also why we may want to add an equal amount of oil to each cylinder, during a wet test. I think that one of you touched on this!
To the OP here.... good luck! I hope that you get this resolved!
.