"I run a 2000 Merc Cruiser 135
"I run a 2000 Merc Cruiser 135 hp 3.0L on a Larson 180 normally with a 14.5 dia 19" pitch prop. I get about 43 mph at WOT. Not sure what the RPM is since the tack under reads. It shows 3200 but last year a tech put a meter on the engine and it runs at 4800.
I recently tried a 23" pitch prop and only picked up about 3 mph at top end and indiacted rpm dropped by about 400. I can hear the significant change in rpm too.
I'm wondering what the max pitch I can run on this motor without causing problems by lowering the rpm so much. I'd like to see what kind of speed is possible from it, understanding that I need to switch the prop when we use it for skiing to get out of the hole. Also interested to know what percentage of fuel efficiency I pick up with the higher pitch prop at cruise.
Also, is there an adjustment that I can make on the indicated rpm at the gauge? It's under read since brand new.
Thanks.
BTW the prop calculator from the April 26, 2007 post was pretty much right on for the test conditions I ran last weekend. Thanks."
"I run a 2000 Merc Cruiser 135 hp 3.0L on a Larson 180 normally with a 14.5 dia 19" pitch prop. I get about 43 mph at WOT. Not sure what the RPM is since the tack under reads. It shows 3200 but last year a tech put a meter on the engine and it runs at 4800.
I recently tried a 23" pitch prop and only picked up about 3 mph at top end and indiacted rpm dropped by about 400. I can hear the significant change in rpm too.
I'm wondering what the max pitch I can run on this motor without causing problems by lowering the rpm so much. I'd like to see what kind of speed is possible from it, understanding that I need to switch the prop when we use it for skiing to get out of the hole. Also interested to know what percentage of fuel efficiency I pick up with the higher pitch prop at cruise.
Also, is there an adjustment that I can make on the indicated rpm at the gauge? It's under read since brand new.
Thanks.
BTW the prop calculator from the April 26, 2007 post was pretty much right on for the test conditions I ran last weekend. Thanks."