Logo

Gear ratio help

Jeff8330

Member
Well, my 1981 sea ray sedan bridge has two opposite rotation mercruiser 330s (454s) in it now. They're pretty much done for.i am repowering it with a set of standard (LH) spinning 2003 crusader mpi motors. They'll be more than adequate. My question is my current trans' are velvet drives (72c's) I know I can't run these in the opposite direction. Anyway, even if I could, that's irrelevant to this post. So I'm going to go with hurths. The velvet drives in my boat are 1.52.1. What am I going to need to run with the small blocks??? Here's the skinny on my boat.

81 sedan bridge.
2.25" shafts
12,000 lbs
Not sure on the props
Any help would be appreciated. I understand gear ratios in cars real well. But not so much when it comes to marine transmissions. Thank in advance.
 
FYI: I run a 1971 Luhrs (bought new). About 13,800 lbs. Now has 1992 270HO 350ci contrarotating Crusaders. Velvet Drives. Walter vee-drives 1.25" shaft 1.5:1, 17x15" cupped Michigan wheels. Peak RPM about 4200, at ehich speed is about 30 kts.
 
I'm a bit hard pressed to believe you have two RH Merc 330's in the same hull....but I've seen stranger....

That said, I'd expect you will need new shafts. On the reduction, you have the choice between 1.5:1 and 2.0:1....most go with the 1.5:1 to enable a decent speed once up on plane. You'll also likely to need a new set of wheels. A good prop shop is your best source of info for these issues.
 
May I suggest that you stay with one thread or the other?
Here is your other thread regarding what appears to be the same topic.
http://www.marineengine.com/boat-forum/showthread.php?461611-Gear-ratio-help



RicardoMarine said:
Jeff, if I'm reading this correctly, you have gone from BBC engines with a 4.250" bore and 4.000" stroke to SBC engines (I presume 5.7s) with a 4.000" bore and 3.480" stroke. If correct, your engine torque will now be significantly less.

While I am not able to suggest a final reduction for you, I do know that we cannot prop ourselves out of an incorrect reduction. It just simply doesn't work that way.

I would suggest speaking with a Hurth or Borg Warner pro and ask for a reduction recommendation.

As you know, with both new engines being Std LH Rotation, one transmission will need to be "opposite of engine rotation capable".


One other thought.... if you've not yet purchased these SBCs, the 6.2L (377) or 6.3L (383) version will offer more torque.



Post back once you've learned what reduction will work!
 
Back
Top