New guy question. Have a 77 Viking 43. It still runs the original 454 350s with 1400 hours on them (knocking on wood!). Raw water cooled. The only saving grace, I think, is that it spent all but the last 3 years in fresh water and seemed to get decent care and maintenance. When I bought the boat, cheap, I had long debates on the gas vs diesel issue, but came to the conclusion (with some good input from local gearheads that work on a lot of commercial boats) that Crusader had a real workhorse engine in the 454 - 350.
Crusader still sold new 454s, etc, when I bought the boat. So far so good. As of right now, after the demise of the 454, it appears that the 8.1 is on its way out of the Crusader lineup.
Due to torque, it seems that while the 8.1 more or less bolts up, repropping ($$$) is in order if you can still get an 8.1. This leads to "how about a 454 rebuild?". It seems to me that a lot of the older 454s were raw water cooled. Here's the question: If a lot of the 454s were raw water cooled, what are the chances of getting a rebuilt 454 with a good block that doesn't have cooling channel corrosion and/or heat transfer issues? Are there any objective criteria that can be used to evaluate that condition? Lots of good stuff on this forum - really appreciate the help.
Crusader still sold new 454s, etc, when I bought the boat. So far so good. As of right now, after the demise of the 454, it appears that the 8.1 is on its way out of the Crusader lineup.
Due to torque, it seems that while the 8.1 more or less bolts up, repropping ($$$) is in order if you can still get an 8.1. This leads to "how about a 454 rebuild?". It seems to me that a lot of the older 454s were raw water cooled. Here's the question: If a lot of the 454s were raw water cooled, what are the chances of getting a rebuilt 454 with a good block that doesn't have cooling channel corrosion and/or heat transfer issues? Are there any objective criteria that can be used to evaluate that condition? Lots of good stuff on this forum - really appreciate the help.