Re: 92 model Johnson auto oiler
I'll just throw my 2 cents into your thoughts.
This model would have had OMC's VRO2 system which was/is an excellent system and really is a "variable rate oiler" compared to some systems which strictly mix at 50:1.
This one vary's the mix between 150:1 and 50:1 as required and as noted it is a combination fuel pump and oil pump.
And yes I realize the replacement cost can be upwards of 400 bucks, but you can change it in your driveway with very few tools.
Over the service life of your engine running it with the VRO will cut your total oil consumption in half compared to running "mix it yourself" - since you can't vary the mix in a tank.
With a decent 2 stroke oil going for about 20 bucks a gallon if you use your motor a fair bit it doesn't take long for the VRO to pay for itself.
Plus you add in the cost of dealing with all the extra carbon that the cylinders get loaded up with and the plugs get fouled with because you are running 50:1 when the motor only needs 150:1 and after not too long "mixing yourself" becomes a far more expensive prospect that replacing the VRO.
So I would suggest that you get some actual facts on the pro's/con's of the system - and I don't mean "some guy" down at the dock.
Ask the experts - I think you will hard pressed to find many that can say to you for a fact that a powerhead was toasted because of a bad VRO2 system - it's a myth that these kill motors - owners who neglect the regular maintenance kill 99 motors for every 1 that dies due to factory defect, parts defect or an oiler that decided to quit (which has an alarm system that will tell you if it's not pumping oil).
To replace the fuel pump on this with the "fuel pump only" version would cost you about 200 bucks anyhow, why not drop the other 200 and put back a proven, safe system that will save you money in the long run....
(and yes, I run a VRO2 which replaced the original VRO on my 1986, 140 and if it ever goes another new one will replace it)...