This can easily become one of those heated topics.... and I wish to avoid that.
These are my thoughts only, and are not intended to start an argument here.
It's always a good discussion though!
Chief, just to clarify......, the full dished pistons are what GM is commonly using in these SBC marine engines to render the correct C/R. If we have a Mercruiser SBC, this is very likely similar to what you'd find in this engine.
These are inexpensive to produce! They work well, but do not offer a Q/E (quench effect)!
It's the Low Compression/Quench Effect piston (or "Reverse Dome") that I am speaking of. (yes, there is still a dished area in this design.... but not under the wedge!)
The advantage is the quench area that comes up under the "wedge" of the cylinder head.
These are more expensive to produce!
Chief, the above piston (when custom ordered for the application) maintains the same C/R that the full dished piston does. So we have no issues in this area!
Regarding the OEM Mercruiser technical information:
1) I believe that the oil pans used by M/C are nothing more than a fairly standard GM oil pan as we would likely see in auto/truck use. A more true marine oil pan may be found with PleasureCraft or one of the big boat marine engine manufacturers such as an aluminum high volume pan!
2) for years their marine engines used the two bolt mains. Yes, I'd prefer four bolt mains when I build or buy one today.
3) Hardened valve seats were not necessarily a result of a marine environment requirement.
4) and the comment about pistons that improve detonation resistance I would take issue with!
For years the GM marine engines that M/C has used, have been fitted with the full dished pistons to accommodate 64 cc combustion chambers. This is NOT a piston that is good at resisting detonation, IMO.
Why is this piston used?
I would assume Cost and Cost only! It can't be anything else!
5) Roller cam followers.... no brainer! Far better, and most all are rollers these days.
Pretty sure I've mentioned this before, but if any of you have access to Dennis Moore's "Small Block Chevy Marine Performance", you will find a very nice explanation from Dennis on the use of a Q/E piston, over that of the full dished piston.
All of this info is regarding detonation control in the SBC that uses a "wedge" shape as part of the cylinder head combustion chamber design.
It's the wedge and the full dished piston that are the issue!
My point being, for a few more dollars you can build a more true SBC Marine engine. Compression ratio remains the same if a correct piston selection is made.
Thoughts???
.